VituixCAD is not commercial project - so I can afford to lose all users including myself :D No one should wait for free form schema to VituixCAD with bated breath. Some people don't like any restrictions and will select other tools regardless that the same (or even better) result could be achievable with parallel ladder. I'm aware that LspCAD 5.25 -style ladder schema has limits compared to free form. I like the idea of supporting someone who's doing some active development and who seems to put a lot of thought and effort into things already- maybe we can nudge him a little in some directions or feature support. I do often make multiple off axis measurements, and it is possible using the calculator to create off axis curves for pistonic drivers based on driver radiating area diameter may be useful for doing some what-ifs. In the mean time, my first test case will be the Wavecor Ardent, and a modified version for Renron using the SS 12MU/4731- being able to switch in and out two different midrange driver and crossover combos and compare could be useful- first checks will be to see if I can get the base Wavecor Ardent data and networks loaded and correlate with LspCAD. I'll have to look closely to see if I can develop an equivalent network for the Minerva that works effectively, without being too many parts or weird regarding net impedance presented. If the drivers don't have a significant time offset, then this may not be a problem - but it's something to check into. One other potential issue is data phase alignment- I haven't finished checking this out, but it's sounding like using minimum phase data and adjusting the physical offset of drivers may not be supported- he talks about taking all measurements at the same time with the same windowing and mic position. I've got it loaded on my 2010 Mac Pro and the new Dell XPS 15. I prefer do legs and license portability, but this is inexpensive enough to try on my new Dell XPS 4K. ![]() But for the price, it's well worth supporting and giving it a try. I.E., I don't think I could model the modula MT or NatalalieP, and probably not the Minerva. Biggest drawback seems to be no support for series crossovers and some combined filter architectures which I have an inordinate fondness of. Now, it looks like it can do a lot of interesting things. Thanks for the link- I'd never heard of this before, it is kind of like LspCAD on steroids (in a good way). With a bit of reading the available documentation the getting starting is even simpler than LspCad and at least in my opionion also easier than using the Excel base tools available. It rivals most features and adds very nice off axis / power response functionalities. A very capable tool for a cost less than that of LspCAD. This is a speaker design package from Finland. If you can run Windows software you might want to look at With waveguide and coax units thats a big difference. LspCad will then use that model instead of the in built simple off axis model. ![]() ![]() I've level aligned all the differing angle measurements, low cut all beside 0deg and then added those in single file in series. It can hold tens of measurements in one session and allow to show max 3 at the time.īy the way- the file tw_onaxis_50cm_ext.txt in the file is an LspCad extended frd format. Holm Impulse is kind of in between the two. and of course how the graphs look like is just wonderful.ĪRTA has it's one file per instance workflow, which is not as convenient for series of measurement (if one wants to make many off axis measurements etc) The way it can hold / gate / show many measurements is the best. Other than that I have Fuzzmeasure (older one), but as I have a MacMini only in living room system it's a bit limited how often I use it.įuzzmeasure has by far the best workflow for speaker measurements for crossover design. I have also ARTA which is generally my most often used go to program.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |